Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Rethinking Rotated Object Detection with Gaussian Wasserstein Distance Loss

Published Jan 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Rethinking Rotated Object Detection with Gaussian Wasserstein Distance Loss is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Computer vision R+F+G Box Def. 84.28 paper-derived
Computer vision UCAS-AOD Box Def. 94.56 paper-derived
Computer vision RC1 & RC2 mAP 50 75.7 paper-derived
Computer vision Axis Learning mAP 50 78.15 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

OpenMMLab Rotated Object Detection Toolbox and Benchmark

2,163 stars · 644 forks · Last push Sep 28, 2024 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (2163 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: medium

open-mmlab/mmrotate is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open open-mmlab/mmrotate
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected open-mmlab/mmrotate as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1,118
Last push
Nov 7, 2024 (655d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
open-mmlab/mmrotate
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
2,163
Last push
Sep 28, 2024 (696d)

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • open-mmlab/mmrotate has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 696 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
Open open-mmlab/mmrotate

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmrotate.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Datasets

Curated Related

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).