Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibrate
Eugène Berta, David Holzmüller, Michael I. Jordan, Francis R. Bach
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Machine learning classifiers often produce probabilistic predictions that are critical for accurate and interpretable decision-making in various domains. The quality of these predictions is generally evaluated with proper losses, such as cross-entropy, which decompose into two components: calibration error assesses general under/overconfidence, while refinement error measures the ability to distinguish different clas ...
ses. In this paper, we present a novel variational formulation of the calibration-refinement decomposition that sheds new light on post-hoc calibration, and enables rapid estimation of the different terms. Equipped with this new perspective, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that calibration and refinement errors are not minimized simultaneously during training. Selecting the best epoch based on validation loss thus leads to a compromise point that is suboptimal for both terms. To address this, we propose minimizing refinement error only during training (Refine,...), before minimizing calibration error post hoc, using standard techniques (...then Calibrate). Our method integrates seamlessly with any classifier and consistently improves performance across diverse classification tasks.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Machine learning classifiers often produce probabilistic predictions that are critical for accurate and interpretable decision-making in various domains.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Two Experiments in Reducing Overconfidence in Spreadsheet Development.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
0
Citations
0
References
Tasks
Computer science, Early stopping, Hyperparameter, Calibration, Metric (unit), Overconfidence effect, Error detection and correction, Performance metric
Methods
Algorithm
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Related papers
-
Search on Paper2Code
Two Experiments in Reducing Overconfidence in Spreadsheet Development (2009) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Two Experiments in Reducing Overconfidence in Spreadsheet Development (2008) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Two Experiments in Reducing Overconfidence in Spreadsheet Development (2007) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Two sources of overconfidence: Incorporating disconfirming feedback in an entrepreneurial context (2017) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Investor Overconfidence in Experimental Asset Markets across Market States (2019) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Two Experiments in Reducing Overconfidence in Spreadsheet Development (2011) Semantic similarity
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.