Representations of molecules and materials for interpolation of quantum-mechanical simulations via machine learning
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Abstract Computational study of molecules and materials from first principles is a cornerstone of physics, chemistry, and materials science, but limited by the cost of accurate and precise simulations. In settings involving many simulations, machine learning can reduce these costs, often by orders of magnitude, by interpolating between reference simulations. This requires representations that describe any molecule or material and support interpolation. We comprehensively review and discuss current representations and relations between them. For selected state-of-the-art representations, we compare energy predictions for organic molecules, binary alloys, and Al–Ga–In sesquioxides in numerical experiments controlled for data distribution, regression method, and hyper-parameter optimization.
Results and benchmarks
Abstract Computational study of molecules and materials from first principles is a cornerstone of physics, chemistry, and materials science, but limited by the cost of accurate and precise simulations.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.
- Start with framework-native implementations (e.g. PyTorch optimizer module, Optax, or Transformers training loops).
- Replicate the paper ablation settings first, then compare against modern baselines.
Time to first repro: a few hours
This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation is currently available
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
145
Citations
199
References
Tasks
Interpolation (computer graphics), Computer science, Binary number, Quantum, Theoretical computer science, Computational science, Materials Science, Physical Sciences
Methods
Algorithm
Domains
Statistical physics, Materials Chemistry
Related papers
- Acceleration and Extension of Radial Point Interpolation Method (RPIM) to Complex Electromagnetic StructuresSearch on Paper2Code
2020 · Semantic similarity
- A developed phase differences interpolation algorithm in the correlative interferometerSearch on Paper2Code
2012 · Semantic similarity
- Study on spatial interpolation method and its applicationSearch on Paper2Code
2012 · Semantic similarity
- Infinite families of perfect binary arraysSearch on Paper2Code
1988 · Semantic similarity
- The Control of Symmetric Data Interpolation SurfaceSearch on Paper2Code
2008 · Semantic similarity
- Beyond interpolation: optimal reconstruction by quasi-interpolationSearch on Paper2Code
2005 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.