Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Region Mutual Information Loss for Semantic Segmentation

Published Oct 1, 2019
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Region Mutual Information Loss for Semantic Segmentation is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Computer vision BCE mIoU . 77.41 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

This is the code for the NeurIPS 2019 paper Region Mutual Information Loss for Semantic Segmentation.

277 stars · 37 forks · Last push Feb 20, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

ZJULearning/RMI is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open ZJULearning/RMI
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected ZJULearning/RMI as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

ZJULearning/RMI
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
277
Last push
Feb 20, 2026 (187d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
28
Last push
Oct 26, 2023 (1035d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (28 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
3
Last push
Sep 1, 2023 (1091d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • ZJULearning/RMI has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 187 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open ZJULearning/RMI

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/ZJULearning/RMI.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).