RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation
Sihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, Tiansheng Hu, Owen Jiang +2 more
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used across the scientific workflow, including to draft peer-review reports. However, many AI-generated reviews are superficial and insufficiently actionable, leaving authors without concrete, implementable guidance and motivating the gap this work addresses. We propose RbtAct, which targets actionable review feedback generation and places existing peer review rebuttal at...
Results & Benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | RbtAct (Ours) | BLEU@4 | 14.62 |
| Natural language processing | RbtAct -SFT | BLEU@4 | 14.93 |
| Natural language processing | GPT-5-chat | BLEU@4 | 11.17 |
Hardware Requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Best Implementation
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the Implementation Status and Reproduction Path sections below for the current action plan.
Reproduction Path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 2
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Additional Implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face Artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches: