Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
jax

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Regularized Dropout Neural Networks
IWSLT
Accuracy
77.1
Source: paper fulltext
Regularized Dropout Neural Networks
CIFAR-100
Accuracy
78.13
Source: paper fulltext
Classification
CIFAR-100
Accuracy
92.64
Source: paper fulltext
Classification
ImageNet
Accuracy
83.97
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

4 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Regularized Dropout Neural Networks IWSLT Accuracy 77.1 paper-derived No explicit refs
Regularized Dropout Neural Networks CIFAR-100 Accuracy 78.13 paper-derived No explicit refs
Classification CIFAR-100 Accuracy 92.64 paper-derived No explicit refs
Classification ImageNet Accuracy 83.97 paper-derived No explicit refs

R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networks is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

cosmoquester/2021-dialogue-summary-competition is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (127 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 127 GitHub stars.

Open dropreg/R-Drop

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

dropreg/R-Drop
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
879
Last push
May 24, 2024 (755d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (4028 stars)

Stars
4,028
Last push
Aug 18, 2023 (1035d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

dropreg/R-Drop
Historical official
Stars: 879
Last push: May 24, 2024
  • Only historical official repository was found: dropreg/R-Drop.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · dropreg/R-Drop has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 755 days ago.
Open dropreg/R-Drop

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Regularized Dropout Neural Networks, Classification

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.