Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

PTHash: Revisiting FCH Minimal Perfect Hashing

Published Apr 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
PTHash: Revisiting FCH Minimal Perfect Hashing is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
jermp/pthash

✈️ PTHash is a fast and compact minimal perfect hash function.

264 stars · 37 forks · Last push Jul 27, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

jermp/pthash is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open jermp/pthash
Reproduction risks
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected jermp/pthash as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

jermp/pthash
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
264
Last push
Jul 27, 2026 (29d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
roberto-trani/mphf_benchmark
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
39
Last push
Dec 20, 2022 (1344d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
judofyr/zini
alternative
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
76
Last push
Aug 3, 2026 (22d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (76 stars)

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • jermp/pthash has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open jermp/pthash

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • qlibs/mph
    Confidence: Medium

    C++20 [Minimal] Static Perfect Hash library

    262 stars · 21 forks · Last push Jul 20, 2025

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Broaden dataset search

pthash revisiting minimal perfect dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).