Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
User Response Prediction
Criteo
AUC
75.66
Source: paper fulltext
User Response Prediction
FNN
AUC
76.19
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

2 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
User Response Prediction Criteo AUC 75.66 paper-derived No explicit refs
User Response Prediction FNN AUC 76.19 paper-derived No explicit refs

Product-based Neural Networks for User Response Prediction is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (Atomu2014/product-nets).

Open Atomu2014/product-nets

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Atomu2014/product-nets
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
372
Last push
Jan 30, 2020 (2331d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
shenweichen/DeepCTR
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (8037 stars)

Stars
8,037
Last push
Jun 6, 2026 (12d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (3437 stars)

Stars
3,437
Last push
Apr 18, 2026 (61d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

Atomu2014/product-nets
Historical official
Stars: 372
Last push: Jan 30, 2020
  • Only historical official repository was found: Atomu2014/product-nets.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · Atomu2014/product-nets has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 2331 days ago.
Open Atomu2014/product-nets

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

User Response Prediction

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.