Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Powerlaw: a Python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

jeffalstott/powerlaw is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open jeffalstott/powerlaw

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

jeffalstott/powerlaw
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
642
Last push
Apr 9, 2026 (6d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
powerlaw-devs/powerlaw
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (642 stars)

Stars
642
Last push
Apr 9, 2026 (6d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

jeffalstott/powerlaw
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

powerlaw-devs/powerlaw

Stars: 642
Forks: 138
Last push: Apr 9, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Community adoption signal (642 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected jeffalstott/powerlaw as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Ready to Run
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Apr 15, 2026

Ready to reproduce

  • · Clone jeffalstott/powerlaw and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • · CI pipeline detected — automated tests are in place.
  • · Last updated 6 days ago.
Open jeffalstott/powerlaw

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/jeffalstott/powerlaw.git
pip install -e .

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

arxiv:1305.0215 Powerlaw dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote