Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Plug & Play Attacks: Towards Robust and Flexible Model Inversion Attacks is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
48
Last push
Jul 18, 2025 (335d ago)
DockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
ffhibnese/model-inversion-attack-toolbox
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (197 stars)

Stars
197
Last push
May 30, 2026 (19d ago)
ReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (197 stars)

Stars
197
Last push
May 30, 2026 (19d ago)
ReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

[ICML 2022 / ICLR 2024] Source code for our papers "Plug & Play Attacks: Towards Robust and Flexible Model Inversion Attacks" and "Be Careful What You Smooth For".

Stars: 48
Forks: 15
Last push: Jul 18, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (48 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker ✓
  • Selected LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 335 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/LukasStruppek/Plug-and-Play-Attacks.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Broaden model search

plug play attacks robust

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote