Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 22
- Last push
- Jun 15, 2026 (3d ago)
Risk flags
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Yinghong Yu, Guangyuan Li, Jiancheng Yang
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Large-scale 2D foundation models exhibit strong transferable representations, yet extending them to 3D volumetric data typically requires retraining, adapters, or architectural redesign. We introduce PlaneCycle, a training-free, adapter-free operator for architecture-agnostic 2D-to-3D lifting of foundation models. PlaneCycle reuses the original pretrained 2D backbone by cyclically distributing spatial aggregation acr ...
oss orthogonal HW, DW, and DH planes throughout network depth, enabling progressive 3D fusion while preserving pretrained inductive biases. The method introduces no additional parameters and is applicable to arbitrary 2D networks. Using pretrained DINOv3 models, we evaluate PlaneCycle on six 3D classification and three 3D segmentation benchmarks. Without any training, the lifted models exhibit intrinsic 3D fusion capability and, under linear probing, outperform slice-wise 2D baselines and strong 3D counterparts, approaching the performance of fully trained models. With full fine-tuning, PlaneCycle matches standard 3D architectures, highlighting its potential as a seamless and practical 2D-to-3D lifting operator. These results demonstrate that 3D capability can be unlocked from pretrained 2D foundation models without structural modification or retraining. Code is available at https://github.com/HINTLab/PlaneCycle.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Large-scale 2D foundation models exhibit strong transferable representations, yet extending them to 3D volumetric data typically requires retraining, adapters, or architectural redesign.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
None detected
Methods
LoRA / Parameter-efficient tuning
Domains
Computer vision
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.