PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&A
Anna Martin-Boyle, Cara A. C. Leckey, Martha C. Brown, Harmanpreet Kaur
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in scholarly question-answering (QA) systems to help researchers synthesize vast amounts of literature. However, these systems often produce subtle errors (e.g., unsupported claims, errors of omission), and current provenance mechanisms like source citations are not granular enough for the rigorous verification that scholarly domain requires. To address this, we intr...
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark data is not yet available for this paper.
Hardware Requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Best Implementation
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the Implementation Status and Reproduction Path sections below for the current action plan.
Reproduction Path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 2
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Additional Implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face Artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches: