Output Space Entropy Search Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
We consider the problem of black-box multi-objective optimization (MOO) using expensive function evaluations (also referred to as experiments), where the goal is to approximate the true Pareto set of solutions by minimizing the total resource cost of experiments. For example, in hardware design optimization, we need to find the designs that trade-off performance, energy, and area overhead using expensive computational simulations. The key challenge is to select the sequence of experiments to uncover high-quality solutions using minimal resources. In this paper, we propose a general framework for solving MOO problems based on the principle of output space entropy (OSE) search: select the experiment that maximizes the information gained per unit resource cost about the true Pareto front. We appropriately instantiate the principle of OSE search to derive efficient algorithms for the following four MOO problem settings: 1) The most basic single-fidelity setting, where experiments are expensive and accurate; 2) Handling black-box constraints which cannot be evaluated without performing experiments; 3) The discrete multi-fidelity setting, where experiments can vary in the amount of resources consumed and their evaluation accuracy; and 4) The continuous-fidelity setting, where continuous function approximations result in a huge space of experiments. Experiments on diverse synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that our OSE search based algorithms improve over state-of-the-art methods in terms of both computational-efficiency and accuracy of MOO solutions.
Results and benchmarks
We consider the problem of black-box multi-objective optimization (MOO) using expensive function evaluations (also referred to as experiments), where the goal is to approximate the true Pareto set of solutions by minimizing the total resource cost of experiments.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 70/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
sayantann11/all-classification-templetes-for-ML is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: algorithm). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 297 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- sayantann11/all-classification-templetes-for-ML Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 297 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: algorithm
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
13
Citations
84
References
Tasks
Computer science, Fidelity, Entropy (arrow of time), Pareto principle, Black box, Overhead (engineering), Physical Sciences
Methods
Mathematical optimization, Bayesian optimization, Multi-objective optimization, Bayesian probability, Algorithm
Domains
Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics
Related papers
- Falsification of Learning-Based Controllers through Multi-Fidelity Bayesian OptimizationSearch on Paper2Code
2022 · Semantic similarity
- Falsification of Learning-Based Controllers through Multi-Fidelity Bayesian OptimizationSearch on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
- Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design spaceSearch on Paper2Code
2004 · Semantic similarity
- Multi-objective and multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization of laser-plasma accelerationSearch on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
- Metrics for Quality Assessment of a Multiobjective Design Optimization Solution SetSearch on Paper2Code
2000 · Semantic similarity
- Multi-objective and multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization of laser-plasma accelerationSearch on Paper2Code
2022 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.