Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Outer Approximation With Conic Certificates For Mixed-Integer Convex Problems is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MPL-2.0).

Open JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl

Reproduction Risks

  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
140
Last push
Apr 11, 2025 (433d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
chriscoey/PajaritoSupplement
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
3
Last push
Aug 26, 2018 (2852d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (140 stars)

Stars
140
Last push
Apr 11, 2025 (433d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing

Best implementation now

JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

A solver for mixed-integer convex optimization

Stars: 140
Forks: 21
Last push: Apr 11, 2025
License: MPL-2.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (140 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

chriscoey/PajaritoSupplement
Stars: 3
Last push: Aug 26, 2018

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 433 days ago.
Open JuliaOpt/Pajarito.jl

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.