Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 2
- Last push
- Feb 19, 2021 (1947d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Mohamad S. Hasan
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
The large-scale multiple testing inherent to high throughput biological data necessitates very high statistical stringency and thus true effects in data are difficult to detect unless they have high effect sizes. One solution to this problem is to use an independent information to prioritize the most promising features of the data and thus increase the power to detect them. Weighted p-values provide a general framewo ...
rk for doing this in a statistically rigorous fashion. However, calculating weights that incorporate the independent information and optimize statistical power remains a challenging problem despite recent advances in this area. Existing methods tend to perform poorly in the common situation that true positive features are rare and of low effect size. We introduce covariate based weighting methods for calculating optimal weights conditioned on the effect sizes of the tests. This approach uses the probabilistic relationship between covariate and test effect size to calculate more informative weights that are not diluted by null effects as is common with group-based methods. This relationship can be calculated theoretically for normally distributed covariates or estimated empirically in other cases. We showed via simulations and applications to data that this method outperforms existing methods by a large margin in the rare/low effect size scenario and has at least comparable performance in all scenarios.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
The large-scale multiple testing inherent to high throughput biological data necessitates very high statistical stringency and thus true effects in data are difficult to detect unless they have high effect sizes.
Only historical official repository was found (mshasan/OPWeight).
Open mshasan/OPWeightHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
An R package to perform data-driven optimal p-value weighting with independent information
An R package to reproduce the results and figures from the simulations and data described in the optimal p-value weighting with independent information paper
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Scientific computing
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.