Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Object Placement Assessment Dataset
ResNet-18
Balanced Accuracy.
0.772
Source: paper fulltext
Object Placement Assessment Dataset
PlaceNet
Balanced Accuracy.
0.524
Source: paper fulltext
Object Placement Assessment Dataset
TERSE
Balanced Accuracy.
0.500
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Object Placement Assessment Dataset ResNet-18 Balanced Accuracy. 0.772 paper-derived No explicit refs
Object Placement Assessment Dataset PlaceNet Balanced Accuracy. 0.524 paper-derived No explicit refs
Object Placement Assessment Dataset TERSE Balanced Accuracy. 0.500 paper-derived No explicit refs

OPA: Object Placement Assessment Dataset is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
85
Last push
Feb 24, 2026 (65d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (102 stars)

Stars
102
Last push
Feb 24, 2026 (65d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (38 stars)

Stars
38
Last push
Feb 24, 2026 (65d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

The first dataset of composite images with rationality score indicating whether the object placement in a composite image is reasonable.

Stars: 85
Forks: 4
Last push: Feb 24, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (85 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Apr 29, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Object Placement Assessment Dataset

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.