Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 85
- Last push
- Feb 24, 2026 (65d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Placement Assessment Dataset | ResNet-18 | Balanced Accuracy. | 0.772 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Object Placement Assessment Dataset | PlaceNet | Balanced Accuracy. | 0.524 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Object Placement Assessment Dataset | TERSE | Balanced Accuracy. | 0.500 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
OPA: Object Placement Assessment Dataset is the primary contribution described in this paper.
bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPAEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (102 stars)
Risk flags
Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (38 stars)
Risk flags
The first dataset of composite images with rationality score indicating whether the object placement in a composite image is reasonable.
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/bcmi/Object-Placement-Assessment-Dataset-OPA.git
pip install -r requirements.txt No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy model matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceBroaden dataset search
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Object Placement Assessment Dataset
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.