Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Experts

Published Apr 1, 2022
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Experts is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Language modeling Dense (without SMoE) Perplexity. 23.51 paper-derived
Language modeling SMoE Baseline Perplexity. 19.02 paper-derived
Machine translation WMT BLEU 40.6 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited
microsoft/unilm

Large-scale Self-supervised Pre-training Across Tasks, Languages, and Modalities

22,194 stars · 2,704 forks · Last push Jan 23, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (22194 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

microsoft/unilm is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).

Open microsoft/unilm
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected microsoft/unilm as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

microsoft/unilm
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
22,194
Last push
Jan 23, 2026 (215d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
microsoft/torchscale
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
3,138
Last push
Apr 11, 2024 (866d)

Community adoption signal (3138 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • microsoft/unilm has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 215 days ago.
Open microsoft/unilm

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Broaden dataset search

Language modeling dataset representation collapse sparse mixture dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Language modeling, Machine translation

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Language modeling Machine translation

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).