On the Properties of Feature Attribution for Supervised Contrastive Learning
Leonardo Arrighi, Julia Eva Belloni, Aurélie Gallet, Ivan Gentile, Matteo Lippi, Marco Zullich
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Most Neural Networks (NNs) for classification are trained using Cross-Entropy as a loss function. This approach requires the model to have an explicit classification layer. However, there exist alternative approaches, such as Contrastive Learning (CL). Instead of explicitly operating a classification, CL has the NN produce an embedding space where projections of similar data are pulled together, while projections of ...
dissimilar data are pushed apart. In the case of Supervised CL (SCL), labels are adopted as similarity criteria, thus creating an embedding space where the projected data points are well-clustered. SCL provides crucial advantages over CE with regard to adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution detection, thus making it a more natural choice in safety-critical scenarios. In the present paper, we empirically show that NNs for image classification trained with SCL present higher-quality feature attribution explanations than CL with regard to faithfulness, complexity, and continuity. These results reinforce previous findings about CL-based approaches when targeting more trustworthy and transparent NNs and can guide practitioners in the selection of training objectives targeting not only accuracy, but also transparency of the models.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Most Neural Networks (NNs) for classification are trained using Cross-Entropy as a loss function.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
- lightonai/ColBERT-Zero-supervised Curated RelatedDownloads: 33Likes: 3
Broaden model search
Datasets
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Image classification
Methods
None detected
Domains
Computer vision
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.