Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

OffsetBias: Leveraging Debiased Data for Tuning Evaluators is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

ncsoft/offsetbias is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (BSD-3-Clause). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open ncsoft/offsetbias

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

ncsoft/offsetbias
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
26
Last push
Sep 11, 2024 (636d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
RLHFlow/RLHF-Reward-Modeling
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (1533 stars)

Stars
1,533
Last push
Apr 24, 2025 (411d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
atla-ai/selene-mini
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Community adoption signal (30 stars)

Stars
30
Last push
Apr 14, 2025 (421d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

ncsoft/offsetbias
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation of "OffsetBias: Leveraging Debiased Data for Tuning Evaluators"

Stars: 26
Forks: 1
Last push: Sep 11, 2024
License: BSD-3-Clause
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (26 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected ncsoft/offsetbias as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

RLHFlow/RLHF-Reward-Modeling
Stars: 1,533
Last push: Apr 24, 2025

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 8, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · ncsoft/offsetbias has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 636 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open ncsoft/offsetbias

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/ncsoft/offsetbias.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.