Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Image classification
CUB-200-2011
Accuracy
85.83
Source: paper fulltext
Image classification
Cars-196
Accuracy
92.19
Source: paper fulltext
Image classification
Oxford-IIIT Pet
Accuracy
93.81
Source: paper fulltext
Image classification
Oxford-Flower-102
Accuracy
97.10
Source: paper fulltext
Image classification
ft-patches
Accuracy .
80.82
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

6 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Image classification CUB-200-2011 Accuracy 85.83 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification Cars-196 Accuracy 92.19 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification Oxford-IIIT Pet Accuracy 93.81 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification Oxford-Flower-102 Accuracy 97.10 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification ft-patches Accuracy . 80.82 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification ft-original Accuracy . 80.11 paper-derived No explicit refs

Object-Part Attention Model for Fine-grained Image Classification presents a transformer approach for image classification.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018).

Open PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 1 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
92
Last push
Apr 3, 2019 (2635d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018
Historical official
Stars: 92
Last push: Apr 3, 2019
  • Only historical official repository was found: PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018 has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 2635 days ago.
Open PKU-ICST-MIPL/OPAM_TIP2018

Framework baselines

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Image classification

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.