NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are being deployed across various domains today. However, their capacity to solve Capture the Flag (CTF) challenges in cybersecurity has not been thoroughly evaluated. To address this, we develop a novel method to assess LLMs in solving CTF challenges by creating a scalable, open-source benchmark database specifically designed for these applications. This database includes metadata for LLM testing and adaptive learning, compiling a diverse range of CTF challenges from popular competitions. Utilizing the advanced function calling capabilities of LLMs, we build a fully automated system with an enhanced workflow and support for external tool calls. Our benchmark dataset and automated framework allow us to evaluate the performance of five LLMs, encompassing both black-box and open-source models. This work lays the foundation for future research into improving the efficiency of LLMs in interactive cybersecurity tasks and automated task planning. By providing a specialized benchmark, our project offers an ideal platform for developing, testing, and refining LLM-based approaches to vulnerability detection and resolution. Evaluating LLMs on these challenges and comparing with human performance yields insights into their potential for AI-driven cybersecurity solutions to perform real-world threat management. We make our benchmark dataset open source to public https://github.com/NYU-LLM-CTF/NYU_CTF_Bench along with our playground automated framework https://github.com/NYU-LLM-CTF/llm_ctf_automation.
Results and benchmarks
Large Language Models (LLMs) are being deployed across various domains today.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 50/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
Yeti-791/Awesome-Offensive-AI-Agentic-Landscape is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: offensive). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 235 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- Yeti-791/Awesome-Offensive-AI-Agentic-Landscape Adjacent · Confidence: Medium · 235 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: offensive
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
3
Citations
0
References
Tasks
Offensive, Benchmark (surveying), Open source, Scalability, Computer science, Computer Networks and Communications, Physical Sciences
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Computer security
Related papers
- The Soviet Strategic Offensive in Manchuria, 1945: 'August Storm'Search on Paper2Code
2003 · Semantic similarity
- Correlation of offensive and defensive operationsSearch on Paper2Code
2002 · Semantic similarity
- Just Say No: Analyzing the Stance of Neural Dialogue Generation in Offensive ContextsSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Just Say No: Analyzing the Stance of Neural Dialogue Generation in\n Offensive ContextsSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Just Say No: Analyzing the Stance of Neural Dialogue Generation in Offensive ContextsSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Defensive Operations during an Offensive,Search on Paper2Code
1974 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.