Yulu Gan, Phillip Isola
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Pretraining produces a learned parameter vector that is typically treated as a starting point for further iterative adaptation. In this work, we instead view the outcome of pretraining as a distribution over parameter vectors, whose support already contains task-specific experts. We show that in small models such expert solutions occupy a negligible fraction of the volume of this distribution, making their discovery ...
reliant on structured optimization methods such as gradient descent. In contrast, in large, well-pretrained models the density of task-experts increases dramatically, so that diverse, task-improving specialists populate a substantial fraction of the neighborhood around the pretrained weights. Motivated by this perspective, we explore a simple, fully parallel post-training method that samples $N$ parameter perturbations at random, selects the top $K$, and ensembles predictions via majority vote. Despite its simplicity, this approach is competitive with standard post-training methods such as PPO, GRPO, and ES for contemporary large-scale models.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stochastic optimization | GSM8K | Accuracy | 500 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Pretraining produces a learned parameter vector that is typically treated as a starting point for further iterative adaptation.
sunrainyg/RandOpt is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open sunrainyg/RandOptEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Official Codebase for "Neural Thickets: Diverse Task Experts Are Dense Around Pretrained Weights" (ICML 2026 Spotlight)
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/sunrainyg/RandOpt.git
pip install -r requirements.txtFramework baselines
Reference implementation of Adam in PyTorch.
JAX/Flax baseline for Adam variants.
TensorFlow/Keras baseline for Adam.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Stochastic optimization
Methods
Stochastic optimization
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.