Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 4,402
- Last push
- Jun 16, 2026 (1d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Sebastian Sartor, Neil Thompson
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Neural scaling laws have driven significant advancements in machine learning, particularly in domains like language modeling and computer vision. However, the exploration of neural scaling laws within robotics has remained relatively underexplored, despite the growing adoption of foundation models in this field. This paper represents the first comprehensive study to quantify neural scaling laws for Robot Foundation M ...
odels (RFMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in robotics tasks. Through a meta-analysis of 327 research papers, we investigate how data size, model size, and compute resources influence downstream performance across a diverse set of robotic tasks. Consistent with previous scaling law research, our results reveal that the performance of robotic models improves with increased resources, following a power-law relationship. Promisingly, the improvement in robotic task performance scales notably faster than language tasks. This suggests that, while performance on downstream robotic tasks today is often moderate-to-poor, increased data and compute are likely to signficantly improve performance in the future. Also consistent with previous scaling law research, we also observe the emergence of new robot capabilities as models scale.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Neural scaling laws have driven significant advancements in machine learning, particularly in domains like language modeling and computer vision.
gt-ripl/awesome-llm-robotics is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (BSD-3-Clause).
Open gt-ripl/awesome-llm-roboticsHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
A comprehensive list of papers using large language/multi-modal models for Robotics/RL, including papers, codes, and related websites
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Paper list in the survey paper: Toward General-Purpose Robots via Foundation Models: A Survey and Meta-Analysis
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Broaden model search
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
None detected
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Computer vision, Natural Language Processing
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.