Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activity

Published Sep 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activity is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Python tools for participating in Neural Latents Benchmark '21

71 stars · 30 forks · Last push Jan 27, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

neurallatents/nlb_tools is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open neurallatents/nlb_tools
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected neurallatents/nlb_tools as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
71
Last push
Jan 27, 2026 (210d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
7
Last push
Jul 20, 2026 (36d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Aug 11, 2026 (14d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 23, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • neurallatents/nlb_tools has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 210 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
Open neurallatents/nlb_tools

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/neurallatents/nlb_tools.git
pip install -e .

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Evaluating Latent Variable Models Neural Population

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).