Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

Neural Architecture Search without Training is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

idstcv/ZenNAS is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (235 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 235 GitHub stars.

Open BayesWatch/nas-without-training

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

BayesWatch/nas-without-training
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
477
Last push
Aug 6, 2021 (1779d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
1
Last push
Jan 24, 2026 (147d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
0
Last push
Nov 16, 2020 (2042d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

BayesWatch/nas-without-training
Historical official
Stars: 477
Last push: Aug 6, 2021
  • Only historical official repository was found: BayesWatch/nas-without-training.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 20, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · BayesWatch/nas-without-training has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 1779 days ago.
Open BayesWatch/nas-without-training

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • idstcv/ZenNAS
    Adjacent
    Confidence: Low
    Stars: 235

    Community adoption signal (235 stars)

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • NewJerseyStyle/WANN-SDK
    Confidence: Medium

    Evolve neural networks in Python to search for network architecture before weight training

    Stars: 1
    Last push: Jan 24, 2026
    License: MIT

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.