Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Size

Published Sep 1, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Size is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

D-X-Y/NATS-Bench is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Strong overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 196 GitHub stars.

Open D-X-Y/AutoDL-Projects
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: D-X-Y/AutoDL-Projects.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

D-X-Y/AutoDL-Projects
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1,581
Last push
Apr 24, 2022 (1584d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (1581 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
sdnfr/time-bench
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Jun 3, 2024 (814d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
yongsubaek/CustomAutoDL
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Nov 28, 2020 (2097d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 22, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • D-X-Y/AutoDL-Projects has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1584 days ago.
Open D-X-Y/AutoDL-Projects

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • D-X-Y/NATS-Bench Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 196 stars

    Strong overlap with paper title keywords

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).