Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Language modeling
CEDAR
AUC.
84.82
Source: paper fulltext
Language modeling
HanSig
AUC
80.94
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

2 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Language modeling CEDAR AUC. 84.82 paper-derived No explicit refs
Language modeling HanSig AUC 80.94 paper-derived No explicit refs

Multiscale Feature Learning Using Co-Tuplet Loss for Offline Handwritten Signature Verification is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (ashleyfhh/hansig).

Open ashleyfhh/hansig

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

ashleyfhh/hansig
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
18
Last push
Jul 18, 2024 (702d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
hsinmin/hansig
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
18
Last push
Jul 18, 2024 (702d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
hsinmin/HanSig
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
18
Last push
Jul 18, 2024 (702d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

ashleyfhh/hansig
Historical official
Stars: 18
Last push: Jul 18, 2024
  • Only historical official repository was found: ashleyfhh/hansig.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · ashleyfhh/hansig has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 702 days ago.
Open ashleyfhh/hansig

Additional implementations

Official

  • hsinmin/hansig
    Confidence: High

    A large-scale offline Chinese handwritten signature dataset

    Stars: 18
    Forks: 0
    Last push: Jul 18, 2024
    License: NOASSERTION

Community

  • ashleyfhh/MS-SigNet
    Confidence: Medium

    MultiScale Signature feature learning Network for offline handwritten signature verification

    Stars: 5
    Last push: Aug 7, 2025
    License: MIT

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Language modeling

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.