Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Multi-dimensional Speech Quality Assessment in Crowdsourcing is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

microsoft/P.808 is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).

Open microsoft/P.808

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

microsoft/P.808
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
228
Last push
Jun 8, 2026 (12d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
microsoft/sig-challenge
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Community adoption signal (92 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
92
Last push
Jun 9, 2024 (741d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

microsoft/P.808
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

This is an open-source implementation of the ITU P.808 standard for "Subjective evaluation of speech quality with a crowdsourcing approach" (see https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.808/en). It uses Amazon Mechanical Turk as the crowdsourcing platform. It includes implementations for Absolute Category Rating (ACR), Degradation Category Rating (DCR), and Comparison Category Rating (CCR).

Stars: 228
Forks: 59
Last push: Jun 8, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (228 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected microsoft/P.808 as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · microsoft/P.808 has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open microsoft/P.808

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote