Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
The MPLAPACK (formerly MPACK) is a multiple-precision version of LAPACK (https://www.netlib.org/lapack/). MPLAPACK version 2.0.1 is based on LAPACK version 3.9.1 and translated from Fortran 90 to C++ using FABLE, a Fortran to C++ source-to-source conversion tool (https://github.com/cctbx/cctbx_project/tree/master/fable/). MPLAPACK version 2.0.1 provides the real and complex version of MPBLAS, and the real and complex versions of MPLAPACK support all LAPACK features: solvers for systems of simultaneous linear equations, least-squares solutions of linear systems of equations, eigenvalue problems, and singular value problems, and related matrix factorizations except for mixed-precision routines. The MPLAPACK defines an API for numerical linear algebra, similar to LAPACK. It is easy to port legacy C/C++ numerical codes using MPLAPACK. MPLAPACK supports binary64, binary128, FP80 (extended double), MPFR, GMP, and QD libraries (double-double and quad-double). Users can choose MPFR or GMP for arbitrary accurate calculations, double-double or quad-double for fast 32 or 64-decimal calculations. We can consider the binary64 version as the C++ version of LAPACK. Moreover, it comes with an OpenMP accelerated version of MPBLAS for some routines and CUDA (A100 and V100 support) for double-double versions of Rgemm and Rsyrk. The peak performances of the OpenMP version are almost proportional to the number of cores, and the performances of the CUDA version are impressive, and approximately 400-600 GFlops. MPLAPACK is available at GitHub (https://github.com/nakatamaho/mplapack/) under the 2-clause BSD license.
Results and benchmarks
The MPLAPACK (formerly MPACK) is a multiple-precision version of LAPACK (https://www.netlib.org/lapack/).
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Moreover, it comes with an OpenMP accelerated version of MPBLAS for some routines and CUDA (A100 and V100 support) for double-double versions of Rgemm and Rsyrk.
- The peak performances of the OpenMP version are almost proportional to the number of cores, and the performances of the CUDA version are impressive, and approximately 400-600 GFlop
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Scientific computing
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.