Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Morpheus: a fully local, defense-in-depth de-identification engine for Greek clinical text - a benchmark evaluation

Filippos-Paschalis Rorris, Nikoleta Stanitsa, Tatiana Rorri, Foteini Rorri, Constantine N. AntonopoulosPublished Oct 18, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Background and Objective: Clinical free text cannot leave the hospital without de-identification, yet no de-identification system or benchmark exists for Greek clinical text. We evaluated Morpheus, a fully local de-identification pipeline for Greek clinical documents, on 500 synthetic discharge summaries. Methods: The notes (300 cardiac surgery, 100 cardiology, 100 nephrology) were generated by a frontier large language model (Gemini 3.1 Pro) constrained to authentic Greek hospital document layouts. Notes were pre-annotated at generation; two clinicians then independently reviewed and corrected every note, blinded to each other, with disagreements arbitrated. Primary outcomes were recall over must-redact identifiers and over-redaction of clinical content, measured over must-survive probes. Secondary outcomes: residual leaks flagged by an independent egress-review layer, processing time and reproducibility. Results: Inter-annotator agreement was F1 = 0.998. The de-identification rate was 96.59% (7,666/7,937 identifier instances; 95% CI 96.16-96.96): 98.49% for direct and 93.42% for quasi-identifiers. No patient's own complete identifier survived in any note; of 271 residual instances, 199 (73.4%) concerned institutional identity, chiefly the hospital letterhead. The over-redaction rate was 2.82% (190/6,747 probes; 95% CI 2.45-3.24). The egress guard flagged 2 of 271 residuals, both complete telephone numbers. Two independent runs gave identical verdicts. Conclusions: A fully local, deterministic pipeline removed 98.5% of direct patient identifiers from Greek clinical text while altering under 3% of protected clinical content; most residuals concerned the institution, not the patient. To our knowledge this is the first benchmark evaluation of clinical-text de-identification for Greek and the first quantified evaluation of an independent egress-guard layer.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
Background and Objective: Clinical free text cannot leave the hospital without de-identification, yet no de-identification system or benchmark exists for Greek clinical text.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 21, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.