Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Iterative Preference Learning
GSM8K
Accuracy
74.5
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Iterative Preference Learning GSM8K Accuracy 74.5 paper-derived No explicit refs

Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
329
Last push
Jan 29, 2026 (93d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
codelion/optillm
alternative
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Community adoption signal (3451 stars)

Stars
3,451
Last push
Mar 19, 2026 (44d ago)
CIDockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • Low confidence match
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
2
Last push
Jun 14, 2025 (322d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

This is the repository that contains the source code for the Self-Evaluation Guided MCTS for online DPO.

Stars: 329
Forks: 36
Last push: Jan 29, 2026
License: Apache-2.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Community adoption signal (329 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: May 1, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

Broaden demo search

Research context

Tasks

Iterative Preference Learning

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.