MoE-Prism: Disentangling Monolithic Experts for Elastic MoE Services via Model-System Co-Designs
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales model capacity through sparse activation, and is becoming an important architecture for large language models (LLMs). However, existing MoE serving systems typically execute all requests under a fixed routing configuration, limiting their ability to exploit heterogeneous computation requirements across requests. Routing top-$k$, which determines the number of routed experts activated per token, directly controls routed-expert computation and provides a natural mechanism for request-level compute elasticity. Realizing this capability, however, requires finer-grained routing units and efficient runtime execution for heterogeneous routing budgets. We present \textsc{MoE-Prism}, a model and system support framework for request-level compute elasticity in MoE serving. \textsc{MoE-Prism}decomposes monolithic experts into fine-grained sub-experts to expose denser routing operating points and provides a $k$-aware serving runtime that effectively serves heterogeneous routing budgets under both throughput-oriented and latency-sensitive workloads. We implement \textsc{MoE-Prism} on top of vLLM and evaluate it on three representative MoE models. \textsc{MoE-Prism} expands the number of available routing operating points by $4\times$, improves offline inference throughput by up to 33.9\%, and reduces online serving TTFT under heterogeneous workloads. These results demonstrate practical elastic MoE serving with request-level routing targets.
Results and benchmarks
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales model capacity through sparse activation, and is becoming an important architecture for large language models (LLMs).
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
None detected
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.