Modeling bilingual naming performance through laterally-connected SOMs
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Computational models have explanatory power to understand cognition in individuals, but there is usually not enough training data to build such models with traditional machine learning. However, alternative architectures that model neural and cognitive processes in more detail can be more easily fit to individuals and can lead to mechanistic insights into human behavior. BiLex is such a computational model of the bilingual lexicon, containing a shared semantic system and phonetic language systems represented through self-organizing maps. In this study, BiLex was extended further into biological realism with excitatory and inhibitory lateral connections. This extension makes it possible to account for response times as well as common errors such as those based on semantic concept familiarity, typicality, and specificity. The Boston Naming Test was simulated in Spanish and English, and model performance approximated naming accuracy and error types in Spanish-English bilinguals with varying primary and secondary language histories. The results indicated that the approach captures semantic-level processes in bilingual lexical access, thus modeling the semantic cognition of individual subjects. In the future, such models may serve as a foundation for modeling impairments and treatment options.
Results and benchmarks
Computational models have explanatory power to understand cognition in individuals, but there is usually not enough training data to build such models with traditional machine learning.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPX