MobileLLM-R1: Exploring the Limits of Sub-Billion Language Model Reasoners with Open Training Recipes
Changsheng Zhao, Ernie Chang, Zechun Liu, Chia-Jung Chang, Wei Wen, Chen Lai, Sheng Cao, Yuandong Tian, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Yangyang Shi, Vikas Chandra
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
The paradigm shift in large language models (LLMs) from instinctive responses to chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has fueled two prevailing assumptions: (1) reasoning capabilities only emerge in sufficiently large models, and (2) such capabilities require training on massive datasets. While the first assumption has already been challenged by recent sub-billion-parameter reasoning models such as Qwen3-0.6B and DeepSee ...
k distilled variants, the second remains largely unquestioned. In this work, we revisit the necessity of scaling to extremely large corpora (>10T tokens) for reasoning emergence. By carefully curating and resampling open-source datasets that we identify as beneficial under our designed metrics, we demonstrate that strong reasoning abilities can emerge with far less data. Specifically, we show that only ~2T tokens of high-quality data are sufficient, and pre-training with 4.2T tokens on the dataset resampled from these ~2T tokens, followed by a established post-training procedure, enables the development of MobileLLM-R1, a series of sub-billion-parameter reasoning models that substantially outperform prior models trained on fully open-sourced data. For example, MobileLLM-R1-950M achieves an AIME score of 15.5, compared to just 0.6 for OLMo-2-1.48B and 0.3 for SmolLM-2-1.7B. Remarkably, despite being trained on only 11.7% of the tokens compared to Qwen3's proprietary 36T-token corpus for pretraining, MobileLLM-R1-950M matches or surpasses Qwen3-0.6B across multiple reasoning benchmarks. To facilitate further research in this direction, we have made the models (https://huggingface.co/collections/facebook/mobilellm-r1) and code (https://github.com/facebookresearch/MobileLLM-R1) publicly available, along with the complete training recipe, data sources, and data mixing ratios.
Researcher verdict
Useful paper, but implementation path is weak
This page is useful as a benchmark reference and for scoping a cautious reproduction plan, but there is not enough implementation evidence yet to treat it as a trusted build baseline.
Why this page is still worth reading
- Benchmark findings give you an audit trail for validation before picking an implementation path.
- Reproduction risks are surfaced explicitly, which helps decide whether the paper is worth immediate prototyping.
Benchmark trust
Concrete benchmark findings are present and can be audited against the extracted evidence.
Use this page as
Use this page to audit benchmark claims and scope a cautious reproduction plan.
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark evidence drill-down
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | MATH | Perplexity | 500 | llm-grounded | researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0] |
| Natural language processing | HumanEval | Perplexity | 9 | llm-grounded | researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[1] |
The paradigm shift in large language models (LLMs) from instinctive responses to chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has fueled two prevailing assumptions: (1) reasoning capabilities only emerge in sufficiently large models, and (2) such capabilities require training on massive datasets.
Implementation Evidence Summary
No direct maintained repository implementation was found, but paper-linked Hugging Face artifacts are available.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate assumes artifact-level reproduction; full training reproduction may require additional paper details.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
LLM evidence refs: paper.title, paper.abstract, evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_1], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_3], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_10], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_12], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_31], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_5], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_23], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_24], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_26], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[1]
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 78/100, status high.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- Use the paper-linked Hugging Face release as the starting artifact, then reconstruct training and evaluation settings from the paper.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
What is known right now
This page is not strong enough for a full AI-written research brief yet, so the summary is reduced to what is evidenced, what is missing, and what to do next.
What is known
- The paradigm shift in large language models (LLMs) from instinctive responses to chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has fueled two prevailing assumptions: (1) reasoning capabilities only emerge in sufficiently large models, and (2) such capabilities require training on massive datasets.
- Benchmark anchor: Natural language processing on MATH using Perplexity.
What is missing
- Benchmark evidence is not yet strong enough to treat the LLM brief as fully researcher-ready.
- There is no verified maintained implementation path yet.
What to do next
- Use the paper-linked Hugging Face release as the starting artifact, then reconstruct training and evaluation settings from the paper.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper-linked Hugging Face release as the starting artifact, then reconstruct training and evaluation settings from the paper.
- 2
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 3
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Hugging Face artifacts
Models
- facebook/mobilellm-r1 Direct
Datasets
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Natural language processing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.