Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Detection
COCO
AP
57.4
Source: paper fulltext
Computer vision
COCO
AP
50
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

2 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Detection COCO AP 57.4 paper-derived No explicit refs
Computer vision COCO AP 50 paper-derived No explicit refs

Mobile Robot Manipulation using Pure Object Detection is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (griffbr/tfod).

Open griffbr/tfod

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

griffbr/tfod
historical official
Maintenance: Unknown
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
0
Last push
Unknown

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
griffbr/VOSVS
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Low-confidence match based on limited evidence

Stars
23
Last push
Jul 30, 2025 (323d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

griffbr/tfod
Historical official
  • Only historical official repository was found: griffbr/tfod.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

No Repo
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 16, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No verified implementation available

  • · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Open griffbr/tfod

Framework baselines

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Detection, Computer vision

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Detection Computer vision

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote