Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 1
- Last push
- Mar 1, 2026 (7d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Jinqing Li, Jun Ma
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Survival analysis can sometimes involve individuals who will not experience the event of interest, forming what is known as the cured group. Identifying such individuals is not always possible beforehand, as they provide only right-censored data. Ignoring the presence of the cured group can introduce bias in the final model. This paper presents a method for estimating a semiparametric additive hazards model that acco ...
unts for the cured fraction. Unlike regression coefficients in a hazard ratio model, those in an additive hazard model measure hazard differences. The proposed method uses a primal-dual interior point algorithm to obtain constrained maximum penalized likelihood estimates of the model parameters, including the regression coefficients and the baseline hazard, subject to certain non-negativity constraints.
Researcher verdict
Use this page for paper context, links, and research framing only. It is not yet strong enough to support a confident implementation decision.
Why this page is still worth reading
Benchmark trust
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Use this page as
Use this page for context, citations, and paper triage rather than immediate implementation.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Survival analysis can sometimes involve individuals who will not experience the event of interest, forming what is known as the cured group.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
This page is not strong enough for a full AI-written research brief yet, so the summary is reduced to what is evidenced, what is missing, and what to do next.
What is known
What is missing
What to do next
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
None detected
Methods
None detected
Domains
Applied Mathematics
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.