Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoning

Published Aug 1, 2018
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoning is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited
DistributedML/FoolsGold

A sybil-resilient distributed learning protocol.

115 stars · 25 forks · Last push Sep 9, 2025 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

DistributedML/FoolsGold is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).

Open DistributedML/FoolsGold
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected DistributedML/FoolsGold as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

DistributedML/FoolsGold
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
115
Last push
Sep 9, 2025 (415d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Koukyosyumei/AIJack
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
429
Last push
May 30, 2026 (153d)

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (429 stars)

  • Low confidence match
CRYPTO-KU/FL-Byzantine-Library
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
17
Last push
Jul 21, 2026 (101d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • DistributedML/FoolsGold has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 415 days ago.
Open DistributedML/FoolsGold

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).