Mining Frequent Structures in Conceptual Models
Mattia Fumagalli, Tiago Prince Sales, Pedro Paulo F. Barcelos, Giovanni Micale, Vadim Zaytsev, Diego Calvanese, Giancarlo Guizzardi, Calvanese, Diego, Guizzardi, Giancarlo
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
The problem of using structured methods to represent knowledge is well-known in conceptual modeling and has been studied for many years. It has been proven that adopting modeling patterns represents an effective structural method. Patterns are, indeed, generalizable recurrent structures that can be exploited as solutions to design problems. They aid in understanding and improving the process of creating models. The u ...
ndeniable value of using patterns in conceptual modeling was demonstrated in several experimental studies. However, discovering patterns in conceptual models is widely recognized as a highly complex task and a systematic solution to pattern identification is currently lacking. In this paper, we propose a general approach to the problem of discovering frequent structures, as they occur in conceptual modeling languages. As proof of concept, we implement our approach by focusing on two widely-used conceptual modeling languages. This implementation includes an exploratory tool that integrates a frequent subgraph mining algorithm with graph manipulation techniques. The tool processes multiple conceptual models and identifies recurrent structures based on various criteria. We validate the tool using two state-of-the-art curated datasets: one consisting of models encoded in OntoUML and the other in ArchiMate. The primary objective of our approach is to provide a support tool for language engineers. This tool can be used to identify both effective and ineffective modeling practices, enabling the refinement and evolution of conceptual modeling languages. Furthermore, it facilitates the reuse of accumulated expertise, ultimately supporting the creation of higher-quality models in a given language.
Results & Benchmarks
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
The problem of using structured methods to represent knowledge is well-known in conceptual modeling and has been studied for many years.
Implementation Evidence Summary
prakhar1989/awesome-courses is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: computer science). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 68040 GitHub stars.
Reproduction Risks
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- prakhar1989/awesome-coursesAdjacentConfidence: MediumStars: 68,040
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: computer science
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
1
Citations
0
References
Tasks
Computer science, Data science, Information Systems, Physical Sciences
Methods
Conceptual model
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Related papers
-
Search on Paper2Code
ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ (2024) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings" (2017) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Using DataGrid Control to Realize DataBase of Querying in VB6.0 (2000) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Study and Two Types of Typical Usage of DataGrid Web Server Control (2005) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
STKVS: secure technique for keyframes-based video summarization model (2024) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Achieving Parameter of DBSCAN Based on Datagrid (2010) Semantic similarity
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.