Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Making a Pipeline Production-Ready: Challenges and Lessons Learned in the Healthcare Domain

Daniel Angelo Esteves Lawand, Lucas Quaresma Medina Lam, Roberto Oliveira Bolgheroni, Renato Cordeiro Ferreira, Alfredo Goldman +1 morePublished Jun 7, 2025
arXiv PDF DOI
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Deploying a Machine Learning (ML) training pipeline into production requires good software engineering practices. Unfortunately, the typical data science workflow often leads to code that lacks critical software quality attributes. This experience report investigates this problem in SPIRA, a project whose goal is to create an ML-Enabled System (MLES) to pre-diagnose insufficiency respiratory via speech analysis. This paper presents an overview of the architecture of the MLES, then compares three versions of its Continuous Training subsystem: from a proof of concept Big Ball of Mud (v1), to a design pattern-based Modular Monolith (v2), to a test-driven set of Microservices (v3) Each version improved its overall extensibility, maintainability, robustness, and resiliency. The paper shares challenges and lessons learned in this process, offering insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to productionize their pipelines.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Deploying a Machine Learning (ML) training pipeline into production requires good software engineering practices.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3).

Open spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Jul 6, 2025 (414d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code

  • No push in 12+ months
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Jul 6, 2025 (414d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1
Last push
Jul 6, 2025 (414d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3 has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 414 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
Open spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/spirabr/SPIRA-training-v3.git
pip install -e .

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • spirabr/SPIRA-training-v1
    Confidence: Medium

    SPIRA Model Trainer v1 (experimental pipeline) by @edresson

    0 stars · 1 forks · Last push Jul 6, 2025 · MIT license

  • spirabr/SPIRA-training-v2
    Confidence: Medium

    SPIRA Model Trainer v2 (redesigned pipeline) by @danlawand

    1 stars · 1 forks · Last push Jul 6, 2025

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

1

Citations

4

References

Tasks

Computer science, Microservices, Workflow, Pipeline (software), Software engineering, Modular design, DevOps, Domain (mathematical analysis)

Methods

Architecture, Software architecture

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).