m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks
Results and benchmarks
m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks is the primary contribution described in this paper.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | Llama-2-7b | accuracy. | 10.52 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
m&ms: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal tasks
46 stars · 5 forks · Last push Sep 26, 2024
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
raivnlab/mnms is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open raivnlab/mnms- License metadata missing
- No CI workflows detected
- Selected raivnlab/mnms as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
- Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 46
- Last push
- Sep 26, 2024 (698d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 46
- Last push
- Sep 26, 2024 (698d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 15
- Last push
- Oct 3, 2024 (691d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Setup required
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
- raivnlab/mnms has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
- Last push was 698 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
- No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
- No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/raivnlab/mnms.git
pip install -r requirements.txt Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- jbdel/ECCV24-papers-huggingface
Confidence: Low · 15 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
No trustworthy models matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceDatasets
- evaluate/glue-ci
1,810 downloads · 1 likes · Updated Aug 11, 2025
- evaluate/media
1,818 downloads · 0 likes · Updated Nov 22, 2022
Broaden dataset search
Spaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Generation
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).