Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks

Published Mar 1, 2024
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Generation Llama-2-7b accuracy. 10.52 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

m&ms: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal tasks

46 stars · 5 forks · Last push Sep 26, 2024

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

raivnlab/mnms is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open raivnlab/mnms
Reproduction risks
  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected raivnlab/mnms as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

raivnlab/mnms
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
46
Last push
Sep 26, 2024 (698d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
RAIVNLab/mms
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
46
Last push
Sep 26, 2024 (698d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
15
Last push
Oct 3, 2024 (691d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • raivnlab/mnms has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 698 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open raivnlab/mnms

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/raivnlab/mnms.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Generation

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).