LRC-WeatherNet: LiDAR, RADAR, and Camera Fusion Network for Real-time Weather-type Classification in Autonomous Driving
Nour Alhuda Albashir, Lars Pernickel, Danial Hamoud, Idriss Gouigah, Eren Erdal Aksoy
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Autonomous vehicles face major perception and navigation challenges in adverse weather such as rain, fog, and snow, which degrade the performance of LiDAR, RADAR, and RGB camera sensors. While each sensor type offers unique strengths, such as RADAR robustness in poor visibility and LiDAR precision in clear conditions, they also suffer distinct limitations when exposed to environmental obstructions. This study propose ...
s LRC-WeatherNet, a novel multi-sensor fusion framework that integrates LiDAR, RADAR, and camera data for real-time classification of weather conditions. By employing both early fusion using a unified Bird's Eye View representation and mid-level gated fusion of modality-specific feature maps, our approach adapts to the varying reliability of each sensor under changing weather. Evaluated on the extensive MSU-4S dataset covering nine weather types, LRC-WeatherNet achieves superior classification performance and computational efficiency, significantly outperforming unimodal baselines in adverse conditions. This work is the first to combine all three modalities for robust, real-time weather classification in autonomous driving. We release our trained models and source code in https://github.com/nouralhudaalbashir/LRC-WeatherNet.
Results & Benchmarks
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Autonomous vehicles face major perception and navigation challenges in adverse weather such as rain, fog, and snow, which degrade the performance of LiDAR, RADAR, and RGB camera sensors.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Autonomous driving
Methods
None detected
Domains
Autonomous Driving
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.