Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 5
- Last push
- Jun 26, 2026 (0d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Yanghao Wang, Hongxu Chen, Jiazhen Liu, Zhenqi He, Rui Liu, Zhen Wang, Long Chen
The prevalent dual-branch paradigm, i.e., training a side network to encode visual conditions and fusing its intermediate-layer features to a frozen pretrained main network, has shown remarkable success in visual-condition controllable generation. Despite its widespread adoption, the role of the side branch and its training efficiency remain underexplored. In this paper, we first revisit this mainstream paradigm thro ...
ugh the lens of score-based generative modeling: 1) The main network preserves visual perceptual quality by providing a prior unconditional score. 2) The side network steers conditional control by implicitly contributing a likelihood score. Guided by this perspective, we propose LIkelihood Score Alignment (LISA), an effective regularization method that explicitly aligns the intermediate feature of the side network with an approximated likelihood score. Specifically, we first hook features from a designated layer of the side network and project them into the score latent space by a lightweight decoder. Then, we construct an approximated likelihood score target and calculate the distance between the decoder's output and this target as an additional regularization loss. Finally, we jointly optimize the side network and decoder with both standard diffusion loss and our regularization loss. Experiments across various image/video tasks, architectures, and diffusion/flow models demonstrated that LISA can not only consistently accelerate the training convergence and improve final synthetic results, but also encourage the side network's features to be more disentangled for conditional modeling with negligible additional training cost and zero extra inference cost.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segmentation | T2I-Adapter | Segmentation Map. | 59.10 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Segmentation | 32.27 | Pose Map | 84.85 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Segmentation | 32.12 | Pose Map | 31.67 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Segmentation | + LISA (ours) | Segmentation Map. | 58.12 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Segmentation | 32.30 | Pose Map | 85.94 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Segmentation | 32.07 | Pose Map | 31.70 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
The prevalent dual-branch paradigm, i.e., training a side network to encode visual conditions and fusing its intermediate-layer features to a frozen pretrained main network, has shown remarkable success in visual-condition controllable generation.
diff-usion/Awesome-Diffusion-Models is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: diffusion). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 12350 GitHub stars.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
Framework baselines
Practical baseline for diffusion model reproduction.
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: diffusion
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Segmentation
Methods
Diffusion
Domains
Computer vision
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.