Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Detection
RAGTruth
F1
79.22
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Detection RAGTruth F1 79.22 paper-derived No explicit refs

LettuceDetect: A Hallucination Detection Framework for RAG Applications is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
575
Last push
May 11, 2026 (8d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Community adoption signal (555 stars)

Stars
555
Last push
Oct 7, 2025 (224d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
Mar 12, 2026 (68d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Lightweight hallucination detection framework for RAG applications

Stars: 575
Forks: 39
Last push: May 11, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (575 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Ready to Run
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: May 19, 2026

Ready to reproduce

  • · Clone KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • · CI pipeline detected — automated tests are in place.
  • · Last updated 8 days ago.
Open KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/KRLabsOrg/LettuceDetect.git
pip install -e .

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Detection, Hallucination Detection Framework Rag Applications

Methods

Retrieval-augmented generation

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.