Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Active Semantic Goal Navigation
L2M-Offline
F1 .
30.5
Source: paper fulltext
Active Semantic Goal Navigation
L2M-Entropy
F1 .
31.2
Source: paper fulltext
Active Semantic Goal Navigation
L2M-BALD
F1 .
31.8
Source: paper fulltext
Active Semantic Goal Navigation
31.2
IoU
24.3
Source: paper fulltext
Active Semantic Goal Navigation
48.5
IoU
47.0
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

5 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Active Semantic Goal Navigation L2M-Offline F1 . 30.5 paper-derived No explicit refs
Active Semantic Goal Navigation L2M-Entropy F1 . 31.2 paper-derived No explicit refs
Active Semantic Goal Navigation L2M-BALD F1 . 31.8 paper-derived No explicit refs
Active Semantic Goal Navigation 31.2 IoU 24.3 paper-derived No explicit refs
Active Semantic Goal Navigation 48.5 IoU 47.0 paper-derived No explicit refs

Learning to Map for Active Semantic Goal Navigation is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map).

Open anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
2
Last push
Oct 5, 2021 (1717d ago)
DockerfileDependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
ggeorgak11/L2M
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (27 stars)

Stars
27
Last push
Mar 4, 2022 (1567d ago)
DockerfileDependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map
Historical official
Stars: 2
Last push: Oct 5, 2021
  • Only historical official repository was found: anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 1717 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/anon-iclr2022/learning-to-map.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

Official

  • ggeorgak11/L2M
    Confidence: Medium

    ggeorgak11/L2M

    Stars: 27
    Forks: 3
    Last push: Mar 4, 2022

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Active Semantic Goal Navigation

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Active Semantic Goal Navigation

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote