Learning from Shared-Control Overrides: Context-Driven Acceleration Profile Prediction for Personalized Overtaking
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems are typically calibrated for an average driver, often resulting in a mismatch between vehicle behavior and individual expectations during time-critical maneuvers such as highway overtaking. When the ACC is perceived as too conservative and inconsistent, drivers intervene through throttle overrides, providing implicit feedback on the system's behavior. This paper reframes these override actions as human-in-theloop supervisory signals and proposes a data-driven framework for personalized vehicle adaptation, termed Context-driven Personalized ACC (CoP-ACC). Rather than relying solely on end-to-end regression, which tends to over-smooth dynamic responses, we introduce a hybrid pipeline combining: (i) unsupervised hierarchical clustering to extract representative acceleration profiles from override events; (ii) a context classifier that maps pre-maneuver driving conditions to the appropriate profile; and (iii) a residual regressor that refines the selected profile into a smooth, personalized acceleration profile tailored to the immediate context. Evaluated on real-world public-road data against a withheld forced-ACC baseline, the approach demonstrates high reconstruction fidelity and generates acceleration profiles that tend toward the driver's expected behavior in potential override contexts. The results highlight the potential of learning from shared-control overrides to enable anticipatory, personalized ACC behavior, reducing manual interventions and improving ride comfort.
Results and benchmarks
Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems are typically calibrated for an average driver, often resulting in a mismatch between vehicle behavior and individual expectations during time-critical maneuvers such as highway overtaking.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPX