Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Learning explanations that are hard to vary

Published Sep 1, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Learning explanations that are hard to vary is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

High-level library to help with training and evaluating neural networks in PyTorch flexibly and transparently.

4,775 stars · 713 forks · Last push Aug 17, 2026 · BSD-3-Clause license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (4775 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

pytorch/ignite is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (BSD-3-Clause).

Open pytorch/ignite
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected pytorch/ignite as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

pytorch/ignite
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
4,775
Last push
Aug 17, 2026 (8d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
41
Last push
Nov 12, 2020 (2112d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Archived
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1,630
Last push
Dec 16, 2025 (252d)

Community adoption signal (1630 stars) · Repository is archived

  • Repository archived
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 22, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone pytorch/ignite and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 8 days ago.
Open pytorch/ignite

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/pytorch/ignite.git
pip install -e .

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).