Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Learning Constrained Adaptive Differentiable Predictive Control Policies With Guarantees

Published Apr 1, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Learning Constrained Adaptive Differentiable Predictive Control Policies With Guarantees is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong
pnnl/neuromancer

Pytorch-based framework for solving parametric constrained optimization problems, physics-informed system identification, and parametric model predictive control.

1,369 stars · 187 forks · Last push Aug 5, 2026 · NOASSERTION license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

pnnl/neuromancer is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (NOASSERTION).

Open pnnl/neuromancer
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected pnnl/neuromancer as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

pnnl/neuromancer
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
1,369
Last push
Aug 5, 2026 (20d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
pnnl/deps_arXiv2020
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
63
Last push
Aug 26, 2023 (1095d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
sarahnator/neuromancer
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
May 11, 2025 (471d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone pnnl/neuromancer and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 20 days ago.
Open pnnl/neuromancer

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/pnnl/neuromancer.git
pip install -e .

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Broaden model search

learning constrained adaptive differentiable

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).