Learning Accurate Decision Trees with Bandit Feedback via Quantized Gradient Descent
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Decision trees provide a rich family of highly non-linear but efficient models, due to which they continue to be the go-to family of predictive models by practitioners across domains. But learning trees is challenging due to their discrete decision boundaries. The state-of-the-art (SOTA) techniques resort to (a) learning \textit{soft} trees thereby losing logarithmic inference time; or (b) using methods tailored to specific supervised learning settings, requiring access to labeled examples and loss function. In this work, by leveraging techniques like overparameterization and straight-through estimators, we propose a unified method that enables accurate end-to-end gradient based tree training and can be deployed in a variety of settings like offline supervised learning and online learning with bandit feedback. Using extensive validation on standard benchmarks, we demonstrate that our method provides best of both worlds, i.e., it is competitive to, and in some cases more accurate than methods designed \textit{specifically} for the supervised settings; and in bandit settings, where most existing tree learning techniques are not applicable, our models are still accurate and significantly outperform the applicable SOTA methods.
Results and benchmarks
Decision trees provide a rich family of highly non-linear but efficient models, due to which they continue to be the go-to family of predictive models by practitioners across domains.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 70/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
sayantann11/all-classification-templetes-for-ML is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: decision tree). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 298 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Framework baselines
- PyTorch Adam optimizer docs
Reference implementation of Adam in PyTorch.
- Optax Adam optimizer docs
JAX/Flax baseline for Adam variants.
- Keras Adam optimizer docs
TensorFlow/Keras baseline for Adam.
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- sayantann11/all-classification-templetes-for-ML Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 298 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: decision tree
- Aastha2104/Parkinson-Disease-Prediction Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 194 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: computer science
- poloclub/timbertrek Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 167 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: decision tree
- harshilpatel1799/IoT-Network-Intrusion-Detection-and-Classification-using-Explainable-XAI-Machine-Learning Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 61 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: decision tree
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
2
Citations
50
References
Tasks
Computer science, Decision tree, Tree (set theory), Categorical variable, Supervised learning, Exploit, Differentiable function, Semi-supervised learning
Methods
Mathematical optimization
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Related papers
- Bandit Methods and Selective Prediction in Deep LearningSearch on Paper2Code
2020 · Semantic similarity
- A Contextual Bandit Bake-offSearch on Paper2Code
2018 · Semantic similarity
- Provable and Efficient Algorithms for Federated, Batch and Reinforcement LearningSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- A New View of Predictive State Methods for Dynamical System Learning.Search on Paper2Code
2015 · Semantic similarity
- A discriminative model for semi-supervised learningSearch on Paper2Code
2010 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.