Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Control is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

aangelopoulos/ltt is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open aangelopoulos/ltt

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

aangelopoulos/ltt
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
74
Last push
Nov 17, 2024 (581d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
tail-unica/conformal_hopwise
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
1
Last push
May 29, 2026 (22d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
justwantrich/Text-risk-warning---Switch-to-manual-mode
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
Jun 10, 2026 (10d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

aangelopoulos/ltt
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Control

Stars: 74
Forks: 10
Last push: Nov 17, 2024
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (74 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected aangelopoulos/ltt as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · aangelopoulos/ltt has environment.yml but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 581 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open aangelopoulos/ltt

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/aangelopoulos/ltt.git
conda env create -f environment.yml && conda activate <env-name>

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

learn then test calibrating dataset
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote