Latent Speech-Text Transformer
Yen-Ju Lu, Yashesh Gaur, Wei Zhou, Benjamin Muller, Jesus Villalba, Najim Dehak, Luke Zettlemoyer, Gargi Ghosh, Mike Lewis, Srinivasan Iyer, Duc Le
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Auto-regressive speech-text models pre-trained on interleaved text tokens and discretized speech tokens demonstrate strong speech understanding and generation, yet remain substantially less compute-efficient than text LLMs, partly due to the much longer sequences of speech tokens relative to text. This modality imbalance disproportionately allocates pre-training and inference compute to speech, potentially hindering ...
effective cross-modal alignment and slowing performance scaling by orders of magnitude. We introduce the Latent Speech-Text Transformer (LST), which aggregates speech tokens into latent speech patches that serve as higher-level autoregressive units. This design aligns the sequence-modeling granularity between speech and text while improving computational efficiency. The resulting patches can align with textual units to facilitate cross-modal knowledge transfer and compactly capture recurring acoustic patterns such as silence. Across story-completion benchmarks under both compute-controlled and data-controlled settings, LST consistently improves speech accuracy while also improving text performance, achieving up to +6.5% absolute gain on speech HellaSwag in compute-controlled training (+5.3% in data-controlled training). Under compute-controlled scaling from 420M to 1.8B parameters in a near compute-optimal regime, gains grow with scale, and improvements persist up to 7B parameters under fixed-token budgets. These benefits extend to downstream tasks: LST stabilizes ASR adaptation and reduces the effective autoregressive sequence length during ASR and TTS inference, lowering computational cost without degrading reconstruction quality. The code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/lst.
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark evidence drill-down
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | LibriSpeech | WER | 202 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Auto-regressive speech-text models pre-trained on interleaved text tokens and discretized speech tokens demonstrate strong speech understanding and generation, yet remain substantially less compute-efficient than text LLMs, partly due to the much longer sequences of speech tokens relative to text.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
LLM evidence refs: paper.abstract, researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[1], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_8], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_5], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_10], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_7], researcherSummary.reproductionRisks, guidance.riskFlags
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from this likely method family: Transformer.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Framework baselines
- Hugging Face Transformers training guide
Modern transformer training baseline.
- PyTorch nn.Transformer docs
Reference transformer building block implementation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Speech, Generation
Methods
Transformer
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.